Getting to the Next Level of Your Business

Sometimes it’s hard for business owners to know how to take their businesses to the next level of growth and profitability. If you’ve been stuck at the same level of revenue or profit for a while, it could be because scaling your business is not a skill in your toolkit… yet. 


Enter a classic management book on scaling your business: High Output Management by Andrew Grove, ex-chairman and CEO of Intel. While the book was written in 1983, it has made a recent comeback in Silicon Valley, but it’s still not well-known outside of the Bay Area. Many people who have read it say it’s the best management book they’ve ever read—life-changing even. 


In the book, Grove applies the principles of engineering and manufacturing production to management. It’s all about process—developing processes and procedures so you can track what’s going on and measure the results or output every step of the way. Only then can you improve the process so it leads to higher output. 


Measurement is an important concept in the book. No matter what business you’re in, you can apply the ideas of developing processes, measuring them, and improving upon them in your business. 


Grove explains how managers can motivate their team members and improve production. He talks a lot about leverage, which enables scaling both positively and negatively, and how it can affect employees’ output. One example of positive leverage is when managers ‘nudge’ employees to enable their work. A negative example is when managers meddle and get in the way of progress. 


In the section on meetings, Grove breaks the topic down by purpose and lends his ideas on how to run each type of meeting better. He touches on other key topics such as decision-making, planning, motivation, performance reviews, and values. 


One significant highlight from the book: If you’re motivated to become a better manager and wish to improve the output of your organization, there’s nothing more important than training yourself.


Reading this book is a wonderful way to spend time learning new business skills you can put into action immediately. 

Our Latest Insight


By Alisa McCabe • October 27, 2026
For project-based businesses, a healthy income statement can be dangerously deceiving. You might land a landmark contract and boast a record-breaking backlog, yet still find yourself scrambling to cover payroll by Friday. Why? Because in project-driven models, profitability and cash in the bank rarely move in sync. Between delayed milestone payments, scope creep, upfront vendor costs, and unpredictable client approval cycles, managing cash flow is a constant balancing act. A reliable cash flow forecast isn't just a nice-to-have financial report, it is your early warning system.  This comprehensive guide walks through the frameworks, metrics, and best practices required to master cash flow forecasting for project-based operations.
By Alisa McCabe • October 26, 2026
Selecting an accounting method is one of the most critical structural decisions a construction business will make. While cash accounting offers simplicity and direct visibility into liquidity, accrual accounting provides a far more accurate reflection of long-term operational health by matching revenues directly with the expenses incurred to earn them. Given the prevalence of progress billings, subcontractor payables, and inventory costs in construction, transitioning from cash to accrual (or managing a hybrid model) often becomes mandatory as revenue grows. This guide breaks down the key mechanics of cash vs. accrual accounting for contractors, IRS eligibility rules, and how each method impacts your financial reporting and bottom line. Understanding Cash vs Accrual Accounting At its core, the difference between cash and accrual accounting comes down to timing : specifically, when your business officially recognizes income and expenses on its financial statements. ​Cash Basis Accounting: Driven by Money Flow Under cash basis accounting , financial transactions are recorded only when actual money changes hands: Revenue is recognized when a client's payment lands in your bank account. Expenses are recognized when cash leaves your account to pay a supplier, subcontractor, or bill. Example: You complete a framing job in October and send a $15,000 invoice. The client pays you in December. Under cash accounting, that $15,000 counts as December revenue—it does not exist on your income statement in October or November. For small trade contractors or solo operators, cash accounting is attractive because of its simplicity. It gives a direct, real-time picture of how much spendable cash is in your bank account today. Accrual Basis Accounting: Driven by Activity & Earnings Under accrual basis accounting , transactions are recorded when they are earned or incurred , regardless of when money actually moves. This method follows the matching principle , pairing project revenues with the exact expenses required to generate them.  Revenue is recognized as soon as you complete work or issue an invoice (Accounts Receivable). Expenses are recognized as soon as you receive a subcontractor bill or order materials (Accounts Payable). Example: Using the same framing job above, the $15,000 is recognized as October revenue because that is when the work was performed and billed, even though the cash won't arrive until December. While accrual accounting requires closer tracking of receivables and payables, it delivers a much clearer picture of your company's true profitability and operational health.
By Alisa McCabe • October 15, 2026
​There is a frustrating stage of growth when the business makes more money and becomes harder to run. You expected growth to create leverage. Instead, your calendar is fuller and decisions take longer. Projects compete for the same people. Expenses become harder to explain. Accounting needs more information from Operations. Operations needs more information from Accounting. And the accounting systems that carried you to $2 million were not built for $15 million. Nothing necessarily looks broken. That is what makes this stage so deceptive. The processes that got you here may still work. Your people may still be good. Your customers may still be buying. What changed is the weight your existing structure is being asked to carry. At $2 million, you can still personally compensate for the gaps. Somewhere on the road to $5 million, $10 million, or $15 million, that stops being possible. The business did not suddenly become dysfunctional. It outgrew its dependence on informal coordination.  Part 5 of a 5-part series on the COO-Accounting relationship