3 Fraud Prevention Strategies for Your Business

Internal theft in business is all too common. Search the internet and you will find many articles about embezzlement by trusted employees. 


The good news: There are steps you can take to safeguard yourself and your company without relying on ‘trust’ as a method of prevention.


Reduce the risk of fraud in your business by following these three steps.

1. Establish Internal Controls 

One of the easiest ways to protect yourself against fraud is to have processes in place so no one person has access to your accounts. Creating a process in which there are at least two signatures or approvals on every check or expenditure can help. 


There are electronic systems that can assist you in tracking this approval process and provide tiers of approval. For example, if there is a bill over $5,000, you can require the head of the department to approve it, in addition to the two other approvers.


You should also perform unannounced audits on the system. When you do this, you can catch issues early or deter them entirely—it’s harder to embezzle money when the system is reviewed unexpectedly. 


One of the biggest issues we encounter involves sharing usernames and passwords. Please do not give anyone full access to your accounts. This includes bank accounts, credit cards, and your accounting system. There are permission levels for all these accounts to keep you and your company safe.

2. Establish Separation of Duties

This principle is the basis of a solid internal control system. It involves dividing the responsibility of a process between two or more people. 


For example, the person who collects checks from clients should not be the same person who deposits those checks. The person who reconciles the bank statement should not be the same person who approves payments. And the person who runs payroll should not be on payroll (they should not be paying themselves).

3. Utilize Outsourcing

One of the most effective ways to reduce your risk of fraud is to outsource your bookkeeping and accounting to an experienced company. This provider will be able to create internal controls and have a road map for separation of duties, which will eliminate the risks involved. They will have processes in place to review your transactions, ask questions, and ensure oversight on others in the accounting system.


Implementing fraud prevention strategies now will not only help you control the situation, but it will also save you time and money in the future.

Our Latest Insight


By Alisa McCabe • October 27, 2026
For project-based businesses, a healthy income statement can be dangerously deceiving. You might land a landmark contract and boast a record-breaking backlog, yet still find yourself scrambling to cover payroll by Friday. Why? Because in project-driven models, profitability and cash in the bank rarely move in sync. Between delayed milestone payments, scope creep, upfront vendor costs, and unpredictable client approval cycles, managing cash flow is a constant balancing act. A reliable cash flow forecast isn't just a nice-to-have financial report, it is your early warning system.  This comprehensive guide walks through the frameworks, metrics, and best practices required to master cash flow forecasting for project-based operations.
By Alisa McCabe • October 26, 2026
Selecting an accounting method is one of the most critical structural decisions a construction business will make. While cash accounting offers simplicity and direct visibility into liquidity, accrual accounting provides a far more accurate reflection of long-term operational health by matching revenues directly with the expenses incurred to earn them. Given the prevalence of progress billings, subcontractor payables, and inventory costs in construction, transitioning from cash to accrual (or managing a hybrid model) often becomes mandatory as revenue grows. This guide breaks down the key mechanics of cash vs. accrual accounting for contractors, IRS eligibility rules, and how each method impacts your financial reporting and bottom line. Understanding Cash vs Accrual Accounting At its core, the difference between cash and accrual accounting comes down to timing : specifically, when your business officially recognizes income and expenses on its financial statements. ​Cash Basis Accounting: Driven by Money Flow Under cash basis accounting , financial transactions are recorded only when actual money changes hands: Revenue is recognized when a client's payment lands in your bank account. Expenses are recognized when cash leaves your account to pay a supplier, subcontractor, or bill. Example: You complete a framing job in October and send a $15,000 invoice. The client pays you in December. Under cash accounting, that $15,000 counts as December revenue—it does not exist on your income statement in October or November. For small trade contractors or solo operators, cash accounting is attractive because of its simplicity. It gives a direct, real-time picture of how much spendable cash is in your bank account today. Accrual Basis Accounting: Driven by Activity & Earnings Under accrual basis accounting , transactions are recorded when they are earned or incurred , regardless of when money actually moves. This method follows the matching principle , pairing project revenues with the exact expenses required to generate them.  Revenue is recognized as soon as you complete work or issue an invoice (Accounts Receivable). Expenses are recognized as soon as you receive a subcontractor bill or order materials (Accounts Payable). Example: Using the same framing job above, the $15,000 is recognized as October revenue because that is when the work was performed and billed, even though the cash won't arrive until December. While accrual accounting requires closer tracking of receivables and payables, it delivers a much clearer picture of your company's true profitability and operational health.
By Alisa McCabe • October 15, 2026
​There is a frustrating stage of growth when the business makes more money and becomes harder to run. You expected growth to create leverage. Instead, your calendar is fuller and decisions take longer. Projects compete for the same people. Expenses become harder to explain. Accounting needs more information from Operations. Operations needs more information from Accounting. And the accounting systems that carried you to $2 million were not built for $15 million. Nothing necessarily looks broken. That is what makes this stage so deceptive. The processes that got you here may still work. Your people may still be good. Your customers may still be buying. What changed is the weight your existing structure is being asked to carry. At $2 million, you can still personally compensate for the gaps. Somewhere on the road to $5 million, $10 million, or $15 million, that stops being possible. The business did not suddenly become dysfunctional. It outgrew its dependence on informal coordination.  Part 5 of a 5-part series on the COO-Accounting relationship